FROM THE WIKI ENTRY:
In a system on a chip, peripherals are incorporated into the same integrated circuit as the central processing unit. They are still referred to as "peripherals" despite being permanently attached to (and in some sense part of) their host processor...
Now what does the William Gibson novel "Peripherals" have to do with anything?
And why was he in the same NYC subway car standing over me with another guy
about two months after I bought his book? Coincidence? Hallucination? He just
happened to be wearing the same outfit as his photo on the inside cover of his book.
I kept saying, "Is it? Nah, too old...except that it is...couldn't be." It was.
WHO WHAT WHEN WHERE WHY? Good questions all. The methods and the madness:
The following is what is inflicted, in these cases, on one or a few people in the mid-town-south
west side of NYC. The number of people involved on the other end is beyond rationality or believability.
From a previous blog entry on "unwitting" volunteer CIA programs at Harvard from the 1950's:
"The unwitting undergraduates were submitted to what Murray himself called "vehement sweeping and personally abusive" attacks. Assaults on their egos and cherished ideas and beliefs were the vehicles used to cause high levels of stress and distress to Murry's unwitting guinea pigs.
The above is no longer confined to Dr. Murray's very intelligent but susceptible Harvard
crash-test dummy undergraduates. No human could be anything but susceptible when
subject to what I can only approximate because it cannot be adequately described.
Force and physical contact with the subject or victim happens on occasion but apparently
isn't necessary. Physical force is replaced and everything was and is now done through
a kind of non-stop visual assault by means of a real world imposed augmented reality
which conveniently overrides any local or government laws regarding something so
quant as impeding individual rights. Any attempt at complaint or lawsuit has built-in
deniability and is nullified due to being able to hide behind a wall of disbelief.
To put it bluntly, 24/ 7/ 365 surveillance indoors and out is how it's done. Completely
undetectable, completely unprovable and always dismissed by the automatic default
position of paranoid delusion. (The automatic reaction: "now who would go to all that
trouble? Are you having "center of the world" narcissistic or paranoid persecution issues?")
Some attempt at characterising these completely unnerving, human+++ "peripherals"
from "central casting" is listed below. (I would say from Comedy Central except for
the fact that these very high functioning morons are completely serious and the above
three plusmarks after the word human are completely applicable and accurate.)
USEFUL AND UNUSEFUL CONTEXT:
Everything described in this blog was operating in plain sight as far back as the 1960's and
possibly before then using methods described here. I suspect, without proof, that the
Macrobiotics, Bioenergetics, Sri Chinmoy, Bubba Free John, Sachidananda and many other organizations were completely serious as far as their stated intentions and completely rigged
at the same time. Was it government that was doing this? Doubtful. Security agency
cooperation at the very top is assumed. The groups in question had excellent PR depending
on the image they wanted to project whether it was miracles, badboy orgies, free sex
(likely stupidly false) or relatively conservative but with guru's following script and usually
getting "caught" taking advantage of female followers while prescribing celibacy for
Did I say that guru's getting caught with the females was scripted? Many leaders,
celebrities, some of the very rich seem to be obliged to manufacture some kind of
large scale deliberate public humiliation or downfall under the guise of sex or
substance abuse. The humiliation is real, but the person involved controls how and what
is made public. A kind of imposed voluntary karmic balancing act.
This would account for many "new age" groups of the 1960's - 80's and I suspect most
"deprogrammers" of same. IOW, and so typically, a perverse PR has the public coming
and going. In other contexts, large scal drug smuggling on one hand and for or nonrofit
rehab hospitals on the other, coming and going. Does that qualify as "sweeping unproven
contrary generalization and accusation"? I think it does and I don't say it for the sake of
drama or shock value. Who is it that's going to be shocked anyway? No one.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_height (What does that have to do with anything?)
Now as far as overarching characteristics of the people involved: (some applicable to any group)
More extremely tall people of both sexes than I or anyone would consider normal or average. Women over 6' 1" in flats is not unusual. Males 6' 4" and over are not just seen now and
then but constantly. I briefly spoke to a woman who looked to be in her 70's, easily over
6' 4", probably related to a girl of average height I went with back in 2002 (the one who
licked her pasta sauce off her plate) The older woman was the only one I can remember
in that age group and that tall which means, of course, it happens and who cares?
Are these people supposed to look like and am I supposed to refer to them as "Nephilim"
or biblical offspring of "sons of God" "daughters of men" before the Deluge of Genesis.
I see the Nephilim reference on many so-called fringe internet sites that all seem to be
consistent in their penchant for imitating paranoia and extreme religiosity. There I go
again, did I say imitating? (Now why would someone go to that trouble? Maybe they
just believe what they believe, and what's wrong with that?")
Extreme height is one example of what happens when extremes are made to become
routine across age groups, sexes, nationality. And it will be said, "well, of course,
tall people stand and are noticed and and you should take your meds this instant.")
I am 6', boomer, probably look 40's - 50's, average weight and health, lazy, anxious, no
medication, no nose rings, ponytails, no shaved head, dyed hair, dreads, drugs or tattoos.
No extreme sexual preferences, obsessions, thinking or moods with blood pressure normal
to low. Altogether, pretty dull despite or even because of the nonsense in plain sight that is
made to seem like a reality that one must adapt to. One adapts no matter what one does.
All the negative aspects in the last paragraph are a programmed constant of visual
extremes that I experience day in and day out. Far in excess of what is characteristic
of my or any big city neighborhood. My age would possibly suggest someone who
is projecting and is having trouble coping with the disruptions of changing attitudes etc.
I can take more than occasional crowds, loud pop music, can cope with differences and
disruptions that are part of or exceed the average persons day to day experience. I'm not
talking about anything close to the normal day to day. What I am describing is "unpossible"
except that nothing written here can now be considered by me to be in any way exceptional.
Many of those I am trying to describe favor vegetarianism (as I was for a many years).
Nothing unusual there. "They" seem to eat little, sleep little and have no particular
interest in sex unless called upon to take on outrageous slightly updated 1980's punkish
sexually suggestive attitude or ambiguous appearance. Contrived appearance, contrived
Obsessive cleanliness is a common factor. Getting little sleep strains the immune system.
Keeping everything extremely clean seems to be a way to reduce immune stressors and a
way of keeping busy, keeping active by constantly cleaning. Normally commendable.
A contrived overly polite manner and an emphasis on public service (well gee, what's wrong
with that?) also seems to be used to counter any deliberately weird mannerism or appearance
and to enhance the impression of being an average upstanding citizen beyond reproach.
Women talk in exaggerated little girl up-talk tempos. Guys put on a combination of
vocal fry and mission control. Or else take on gay mannerisms and speech.
Cringeworthy in the extreme to even type this stuff but exactly accurate.
Women that I went with for some months always did something publicly beyond
Comedy Central inappropriate. Like seriously licking pasta from a plate in a
restaurant but not as a joke. Like a grown woman putting a bare hand into a
restaurant buffet. Wearing big cleverge in below freezing weather.
("Well golly, maybe you got what you deserved. You sure knew how to pick them.")
Is that what passes for an average response?
The message from these different women with above average intelligence was twofold:
I don't operate and have no need to operate as you do. You will not be in any kind of
normal relationship with me around. My purpose is to disrupt. Keep your distance.
Not the result of mental illness or sloppy manners but deliberate.
Constant motion and exercise is emphasized. As a guess, not being in constant motion
might in itself invite some kind of automatic direct or indirect negative feedback.
Sound and music seems to be of particular interest as is meditation, and at the
same time, lying and deceit exceeding psychopathic compulsivity. Martial arts
skills are big as is theatre and acting, improvisation and the manipulation of language.
As far as what I constantly see:
Varying degrees of physical deformity, doofy looking bearded white street people
dreadlocked and tattooed and then alternated with their opposites, grossly over
developed over-amped military types seen and encountered until replaced by
something equally monotonous and repulsive, not in themselves but in their
frequent numbers. How is that even possible?
People with deformities will be seen for a given couple of months followed by their
opposites, musclebound types with arms and chests so overdeveloped they are forced
to move or pretend to move in stupidly exaggerated marching motions either alone or
in pairs. Repellent to look at which seems is the point.
So what is going on?
Extreme visual measures are being used to replace physical contact. Attacking cultural
identity by visual means beyond extremes and beyond anything considered reasonable.
Reason or moderation is considered commensurate with cowardliness or mediocrity to
be avoided at any cost.
This is very close to the movie "Jacob's Ladder" without Hollywood elememts of demons,
drugs, psychosis, hallucinations or post combat PTSD. Accounting for that, this movie,
that came out in 1990, depicted something all too stupidly real. Nothing that I see in
public is as it should be but, at the same time, nothing looks flagrantly out of sync to
casual observers. All can be seen as classic bla blah blah or, at my age, classic crotchety old age.
("Well seems to me you're having some kind of breakdown confusing reality with fictional
movies.") and blah blah blah. See, I'm even talking (or typing) to myself. Evident lack
None of this is dependent on my mood, selective attention, preoccupations or dislikes.
I have long since stopped questioning my senses, or thinking I am having a bad day,
month, year or life. Well who is supposed to care about my bad day anyway?